From collectibles to cars, buy and sell all kinds of items on eBay
home | pay | site map
Shop for itemsSell your itemTrack your eBay activitiesLearn, connect, and stay informed-for business and for funGet help, find answers and contact Customer SupportAdvanced Search
Home > Listing Index > Games > Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp.

Games - Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp.


Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. was the first successful attempt in a court of law in the United States to prove that computer software could be protected by copyright.

Franklin Computer Corporation introduced the Franklin Ace 100, a clone of Apple Computer
's Apple II, in 1982. Apple quickly determined that substantial portions of the Franklin ROM and operating system had been copied directly from Apple's versions, and on May 12, 1982, filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. It cited the presence of some of the same embedded strings, such as the name "James Huston" (an Apple programmer), and "Applesoft," on both the Apple and Franklin system disks.

Franklin admitted that it had copied Apple's software but argued that it would have been impractical to independently write its own versions of the software and maintain compatibility, although it said it had written its own version of Apple's copy utility and was working on its own versions of other software. Franklin argued that because Apple's software existed only in machine-readable form, and not in printed form, and because some of the software did not contain copyright notices, it could be freely copied.

Initially, the district court found in favor of Franklin. However, the ruling was overturned in 1983 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (714 F.2d 1240 ), which determined that computer software, including operating systems and system ROMs, could be protected by copyright. Furthermore, the court postulated that copyrightability of computer programs as literary works does not depend on whether they are written in object code or source code, or whether they are application programs or operating systems. Hence Apple was able to force Franklin to withdraw its clones by 1988.

[ Visit the complete Wikipedia entry for Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. ]


Searches on eBay

Some related entries: Optimized Systems Software | Orion Pictures | Cort | Piecepack | Velious | Max Euwe | Codec | Albedo | Medic | Clan | EJay Day

eBay Pulse | eBay Reviews | eBay Stores | Half.com | Kijiji | PayPal | Popular Searches | ProStores | Rent.com | Shopping.com
Australia | Austria | Belgium | China | France | Germany | India | Italy | Spain | United Kingdom

About eBay | Announcements | Security Center | Policies | Site Map | Help